Ancient Macedonian in the Rosetta stone

[Petro Invictus]

Се извинувам на македонската публика што овој текст ќе го објавам на Англиски, но сметам дека е од важност да го разберат и оние кое не се користат со Македонскиот јазик.

Петро Инвиктус

CRACKING THE DEMOTIC TEXT:

The research work of the two scientists Tentov and Bosheski brought forth an interesting issue. Apparently, they managed to decode the middle text from the Rosetta Stone (commonly treated as demotic), using the same approach that the French used to decode the Egyptian hieroglyphs from the first text.



The French used Coptic to decode the language of the Pharaohs, as the closest link to the ancient Egyptians, and our scientists used Macedonian as the closest logical link to the language of the living masters of that time. We know that the Pharaoh that erected the stone was Ptolemy V. Why shouldn't he write a decree in his own language? The fact that the two scientists could determine not only the script, but the phonetics as well, and match it to the modern Macedonian language, shows that the ancient Macedonians, were not illiterate barbarians, but a nation with its own language and script that was in use further, besides the fierce attempt of the Roman policy to erase everything that was of Macedonian glory and thus overate it. Apparently, the Romans were proud conquerers that believed that the world started with them. It is widely known of the ravaging they did over Macedonian population and wealth, scattering it throughout the empire (both people and goods). They were systematically eradicating all signs of Alexander's empire, while ironically following his steps, thus hoping to proclaim themselves as rightful heirs of the Macedonian empire.The fact that the language was almost the same in those times, as it is today, points out that maybe what we know as Slavic in the middle ages is actually the language of the tribes of ancient Macedon. Maybe the migration of the Slavic tribes never took place. They might have never come from behind the Carpathian mountains. They might have migrated from the Balkans to the steppes. This is what archeology points at. The founding of Sindidun (Belgrade today), emerges after the peace agreed between the Celts and the Macedonians in the 4th century BC. (Read the Druid of Sindidun, Vladislav Bajac)

This may go even further: Russian royalty takes its roots from Alexander the Great. (via the Byzantine Order of the Holy Tomb)

Or: The Byzantine empire was the true heir of the Alexander's Empire. Not the West Roman Thanks to Czar Constantine and Elena his mother who was from Naissus (Nish today).

Or: The language that we call Greek today is actually the Esperanto of the ancient world, created by linguists on the basis of 40 languages using the Greek script. It is very different from the earlier Ionic and Doric dialects. This Esperanto in those times was called "Alexandrian" because this city was the center of the Empire. So, the Greek from the Bible is actually this Alexandrian, and the Greek from Byzantium was also an upgraded form of the Alexandrian dialect. The final upgrading of this form of language was done in the 18th and 19th centuries and we have its modern form known as Greek today.

Or: Cyril and Methodius never invented a knew script! They revised the ancient morphemic symbols and upgraded the writing system of the ancient Macedonians. The Glagollic script was political, while the Cyrillic a true revision of the ancient letters. That is why the glagollic was so easily replaced by the new cyrillic.

There are many approaches that need revision.

I hope the world will take notice.


Prof. A.Tentov:

“Translation or transliteration of the Demotic text in terms of reading syllable by syllable (sign by sign) has not been achieved as yet by anyone. What has been done so far is a series of attempts based on a supposition that the Demotic text is identical both in content and the composition of sentences (and words) with the other two texts. However, considering the fact that we are talking about two texts (if we take the ancient Greek and the Demotic for example) on two very different languages (even if we believe it was ancient Greek (or Danaian) and the Egyptian,) IT IS VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE to claim that the composition of sentences and the word order is identical. It is nonsense to claim that!

To the contrary, our methodology has enabled us to read whole lines of the text as well as sentences, and we have reached very logical results – the content of the Demotic text is the same as the other two, but the composition of the sentences and the word order differs a lot. Moreover, in certain sentences we have found examples of various ways of addressing the different nations in accordance to their religious beliefs and their Pantheon of Gods.”